立法審查模式研究.pdf

1、西南交通大學碩士學位論文立法審查模式研究姓名：夏杰陽申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法學理論指導教師：饒艾20100501西南交通大學碩士研究生學位論文第lI頁AbstractAnAmericanscholarsays：iflegalscholarsjustdrawupenormouslaws，buttheylacktheexperienceforthesociallifeanddonotcarewhatthepeoplereallywant，

2、oursocietywillbestuffedwithunrealisticlaws，ironicallyitwillturnupthepuzzledphenomenon：themorelaws，thelessorderTheseeminglyparadoxjustrevealsthedoublesidednatureoflegislationOntheonehand，legislationwillbringtheorderontheo

3、therhand，legislationwillbringdestroyTheresultfortheparadoxatleastcontainstworeasons：one，thecontentofthelegislationdetachtherealityandlackjustifiabilityanotherthelegislativereviewisnotperfectThethesisaimstofind。alegislati

4、vereviewmodewhichisadaptedtoChina’SconditionstoavoidanawkwardsituationBasedontheanalysisandcompareofthecurrentreviewmodearoundtheworld，weconcludethestrengthandtheweaknessofourlegislativereviewmodeBasedonthecurrentmode，th

5、eauthorproposesanimprovedmode：double—trackmodeThismodehopestoconstructaspecialcommitteetoreviewthelegislation，andendowtheaccessoryrightstothecourtTheimprovedmodewillenlargethesubjectofthereviewanditcouldgivecourttheoppor

6、tunitytotakepartinthelegislativereviewthroughthecourtreviewlegislativereviewwillbecomemoreeffectiveandmorereasonableBasedontheenormousmaterialsandanalyzingthecurrentoriginoflawinourcountrytheauthoradoptsmaterialistdialec

7、tics、retrievalmethod、comparativeanalysismethodTheconclusionis：double—trackmodeisapttotheconditionofthecountryKeyword：legislativereview；legislativebodyreviewmode；ordinarycourtreviewmode；specialinstitutionreviewmode；people