2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩39頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文現(xiàn)象學(xué)的自身覺察理論述評姓名:劉玉梅申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):外國哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:張廷國20060508華 中 科 技 大 學(xué) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 華 中 科 技 大 學(xué) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 IIAbstract Abstract The self-awareness theory is not simply a but rather the fundamental problem of phenom

2、enology. Based on the argumentation of the phenomenologists of Edmund Husserl, Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida and Michel Henry, this article attempts to analyze the meaning of self-awareness and its position in

3、 the self-awareness theory of phenomenology, clarify how consciousness is aware of itself, and then throw light on the relation between self-awareness and alterity. First, this article criticizes the refection theory o

4、f self-awareness by pointing out its difficulties through the position of the Heidelberg School. It finds that self-awareness is irrelational, non-objectifying, and immediate. Self-awareness implies an instant

5、aneous happening with the proceeding of object-consciousness, or a self-given state. Michel Henry’s viewpoint of purely immanent self-affection further supports the irrelational character of self-awareness. However,

6、 is original self-awareness really an immediate self-presence, which excludes any alterity, or is there any alterity contained in the nature of self-awareness? In Husserl’s phenomenology, there is an affectio

7、n of the hyle in self-awareness, and he describes hyle as a kind of alterity. Husserl also analyzes the interdependence of self-affection and hetero-affection. Sartre develops the intentionality theory of Hus

8、serl, and he explains consciousness in terms of transcendence and negation, by introducing a tiny separation or even duality into self-awareness. Derrida proceeds with self-awareness from the angle of retention and t

9、he “fissure” of unfolding. He attempts to dissolve presence with diffé rance. At this point, Husserl, Sartre, and Derrida all oppose Henry. However, their claims are different, one moderate and one far more radical.

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論